![bbedit for ipad bbedit for ipad](https://tidbits.com/uploads/2017/10/BBEdit-12-Preview.png)
Bbedit for ipad software#
But situation is different from FSF's POV: that's the organization which is specifically made to promote free software and not to make popular software which makes users happy. Please don't tell me that it's absurd to put the needs/wants of the users lower then the needs/wants of some piece of software (software is not alive, it doesn't have needs, after all). It would be more useful, in fact, a graphical app with a micro-emacs inside, that people can try to discover the capabilities of emacs while getting work done in the while.How would that help to produce more free software? That the main goal here, remember? then the whole point of attracting them is lost. If the price of getting more users is making software not free. Users are just a means to get more developers and developers are needed to make free software.
![bbedit for ipad bbedit for ipad](https://cdn.imgbin.com/8/21/6/imgbin-literatura-infantil-gostosuras-e-bobices-bbedit-screenshot-textwrangler-computer-software-others-gQyZJUWhxz9BWuyHZpGZH0aTL.jpg)
And what would be the end result? More users? But FSF's end goal is not to make users happy! Write GPL4 if needed, talk with Apple and Google, kiss a frog.Lol. If you say that then you don't understand the conflict. I fully understand the conflicts between GPL and the App Store. Please make Emacs iCloud-ready, Dropbox-ready, Pcloud-ready, Box-ready, whatever-ready if you don’t want to create emacs’ own sync service.FSF would never do that and you know why. Apple made it impossible to make GPLed programs for iPad and don't think FSF would be willing to compromise. Having it on the iPad doesn’t.Of course it's absurd. Posted 12:24 UTC (Sun) by khim (subscriber, #9252) It would be more useful, in fact, a graphical app with a micro-emacs inside, that people can try to discover the capabilities of emacs while getting work done in the while. The chatting about dark mode or video tutorials is moot. I know you’re programmers I’m more of an editor, Please make easy, really easy, to output a PDF, writing in Markdown, preview an HTML document. Make it easy to import and export common formats. GPL should contemplate an exception in this case.ģ) Import-Export.
Bbedit for ipad download#
If an app is universally available to whoever wants to download it, freedom of redistributing it is actually pointless. This crusade against app stores is not in the interest of users. Write GPL4 if needed, talk with Apple and Google, kiss a frog.
![bbedit for ipad bbedit for ipad](https://www.macobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/bbedit-12.jpg)
Want emacs to appeal more to users? Make it work for users, then. Please make Emacs iCloud-ready, Dropbox-ready, Pcloud-ready, Box-ready, whatever-ready if you don’t want to create emacs’ own sync service. Having it on the iPad doesn’t.Ģb) Synchronization. I realize that having emacs on a iPhone borders with absurd ok. A reason to switch to emacs would be the ability to u se it from my iPad. Tomorrow morning I’ll wake up, I’ll wake my Mac up, and I’ll instantly work with whatever document I was working now on the iPad. Any other, er, modern editor is Unicode-enabled, period.Ģ) I’m in bed at the moment, writing with my iPad. Please, don’t tell me how easy it is to fix it. We live with accents and other exotic characters. Here follow the main facts that keep me from investing time on emacs:ġ) I’m European.
Bbedit for ipad code#
I do not care about Visual Code Studio or TextMate, I’m happy with BBEdit and I’d be glad to be happier with emacs. I use BBEdit on Mac and would be willing to switch to emacs. Instead, Emacs does not appeal to the “modern” user because of some glaring lacks. Forget other editors, it’s not a matter of competition.